Hunt v. Matthews

505 P.2d 819, 8 Wash. App. 233, 1973 Wash. App. LEXIS 1424
CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedJanuary 15, 1973
Docket1015-1
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 505 P.2d 819 (Hunt v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Matthews, 505 P.2d 819, 8 Wash. App. 233, 1973 Wash. App. LEXIS 1424 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Callow, J.

This is an action to quiet a title claimed to have been acquired by adverse possession. Three major matters are raised: the criteria for ruling on a motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, objections to the trial court’s findings and objections to the conclusions regarding adverse possession.

Plaintiff acquired title by deed to that parcel marked “A” on the map. Title was acquired in 1957 after the plaintiff had leased this residential property for a year. She has lived since in a house on the property. In November 1968, she filed a complaint alleging adverse possession of the adjacent parcel “B” under the 10-year statute, RCW 4.16.020.

Defendants Biele.and Brody are the contract purchasers of the property to the west of plaintiff’s property, their property being bounded on the north by Northeast 95th Street, on the west by Sand Point Way and on the south by the Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way. The wooded and undeveloped property of the defendants includes parcel “B”. When plaintiff acquired parcel “A”, parcel “B” included an irregular and undefined extension of the lawn

*235

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael S Pokorny, Etal v. Judd Tree Service
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2020
Campbell v. Reed
134 Wash. App. 349 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Lingvall v. Bartmess
982 P.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1999)
Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.
936 P.2d 1163 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1997)
Anderson v. Hudak
907 P.2d 305 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1995)
Chaplin v. Sanders
676 P.2d 431 (Washington Supreme Court, 1984)
Peeples v. Port of Bellingham
613 P.2d 1128 (Washington Supreme Court, 1980)
Peeples v. Port of Bellingham
588 P.2d 757 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1978)
Danner v. Bartel
584 P.2d 463 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1978)
Reymore v. Tharp
553 P.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1976)
Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.
547 P.2d 1240 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1976)
City of Seattle v. Heath
520 P.2d 1392 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1974)
Potter v. Pacific National Bank
513 P.2d 76 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 P.2d 819, 8 Wash. App. 233, 1973 Wash. App. LEXIS 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-matthews-washctapp-1973.