David Band v. First Bankcard Center

650 So. 2d 738, 1995 La. LEXIS 590, 1995 WL 64765
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 9, 1995·No. No. 94-C-3062·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application is granted in part. The judgment of the court of appeal, 644 So.2d 211, is amended to clarify that the reversal of a default judgment does not result in a dismissal, with prejudice, of plaintiffs claims. When, as here, the plaintiff has failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendant at the confirmation hearing, the plaintiffs claims aré not rejected; rather, the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See Ascension Builders v. Jumonville, 262 La. 519, 263 So.2d 875, 879 (1972); Griffin v. Pecanland Mall Association, Ltd., 535 So.2d 770, 772-73 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1988), and the cases cited therein. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Band v. First Bankcard Center, 650 So. 2d 738, 1995 La. LEXIS 590, 1995 WL 64765 (La. 1995).

650 So. 2d 738 (David Band v. First Bankcard Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. Alexander
262 So. 3d 1000 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
Cornish v. Doctors Care, LLC
819 So. 2d 1158 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
R & R Steel Erectors v. Watson
809 So. 2d 1228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
Tarpley v. Colfax Chronicle
650 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)