Darius Houston-Randle v. State
This text of Darius Houston-Randle v. State (Darius Houston-Randle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
July 26, 2016
JUDGMENT
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals DARIUS HOUSTON-RANDLE, Appellant
NO. 14-15-00272-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________
This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is MODIFIED by adding the word “not” before the word “true” under the heading “Plea to the Motion to Adjudicate.” The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as MODIFIED. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Darius Houston-Randle v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darius-houston-randle-v-state-texapp-2016.