Darius Houston-Randle v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Darius Houston-Randle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 7903
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 26, 2016·No. 14-15-00272-CR·Published

Opinion

July 26, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals DARIUS HOUSTON-RANDLE, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00272-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is MODIFIED by adding the word “not” before the word “true” under the heading “Plea to the Motion to Adjudicate.” The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as MODIFIED. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darius Houston-Randle v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Darius Houston-Randle v. State (Darius Houston-Randle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.