Daniels v. State

864 So. 2d 565, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 461, 2004 WL 119231
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 837 So. 2d 1008
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2004·No. No. 5D03-3724·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the lower court order that summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief brought pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The court denied Appellant’s motion as successive but failed to attach portions of the record supporting this de[566]*566termination. For that reason, we reverse and remand with instructions that the lower court attach the necessary portions of the record which show that the motion is successive or that the allegations are otherwise refuted. Alternatively, an evi-dentiary hearing should be held to address the merits of the motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 864 So. 2d 565, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 461, 2004 WL 119231 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

864 So. 2d 565 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.