Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Daniels v. State

Daniels v. State

784 So. 2d 1171, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3997, 2001 WL 293199
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 716 So. 2d 827 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2001·No. No. 2D01-565·Published

Opinion

GREEN, Judge.

Baron Daniels challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Daniels might have to file a facially sufficient claim for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 alleging that the error is apparent from the face of the record. See Slingbaum v. State, 751 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 784 So. 2d 1171, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3997, 2001 WL 293199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

784 So. 2d 1171 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slingbaum v. State
751 So. 2d 89 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)