Daniels v. State

780 So. 2d 1042, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4343, 2001 WL 321936
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 2001·No. No. 4D99-3814·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw the per curiam affirmance previously entered in this case, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed. The issues raised in this appeal challenging the constitutionality of the Criminal Punishment, Code have been addressed and rejected by this [1043]*1043court. See Peterson v. State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Kendrick v. State, 769 So.2d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Seward v. State, 768 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). As to the other issues raised in this appeal, we find them to be without merit.

We deny appellant’s motion to certify question of great public importance.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 780 So. 2d 1042, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4343, 2001 WL 321936 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

780 So. 2d 1042 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. Dept. of Corrections
227 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (S.D. Florida, 2002)
Gray v. State
780 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)