Daniels v. State

684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13438, 1996 WL 734832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 634 So. 2d 187
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 1996·No. No. 95-2655·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Daniels’ convictions. Wilcox v. State, 522 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). However, we reverse Daniels’ sentences, finding that he was improperly sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. As the state correctly concedes, Daniels was no longer serving probation on case number 88-16647-B, in which adjudication was withheld, when he committed the charged offenses. Thus, Daniels lacks the requisite predicate offense under section 775.084(2), Florida Statutes (1993), to warrant classification as a habitual violent felony offender. Overstreet v. State, 629 So.2d 125 (Fla.1993).

Convictions affirmed; sentences reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13438, 1996 WL 734832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

684 So. 2d 341 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilcox v. State
522 So. 2d 1062 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Overstreet v. State
629 So. 2d 125 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)