Daniels v. State

654 So. 2d 666, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5097, 1995 WL 275753
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 634 So. 2d 187
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1995·No. No. 94-2034·Published

Opinion

SHARP, W., Judge.

Daniel appeals his sentence for murder which he received after appealing his initial life sentence, which this court vacated and remanded to the trial court for resentencing. Daniels v. State, 636 So.2d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). He argues he should not have been sentenced as an habitual offender, and he notes that he was improperly reclassified as having committed a first degree felony rather than a second degree felony. We affirm as modified.

On remand the trial court sentenced Daniels to thirty years in prison for the murder offense. It relied on its prior finding that Daniels is an habitual offender. We find no error in this regard, and the thirty-year sentence is within the statutory maximum for a second degree habitual felony sentence. § 775.084, Fla.Stat.

However, the trial court apparently reclassified Daniels’ murder offense as a first degree felony on remand, contrary to the mandate of this court. We correct the sentence to show that it is a second degree felony rather than a first degree felony, and otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED as Modified.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 654 So. 2d 666, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5097, 1995 WL 275753 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 666 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
636 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)