Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniels v. State

664 So. 2d 366, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 1996 WL 1143

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 3, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3138

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 664 So. 2d 366 (Daniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniels v. State, 664 So. 2d 366, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 1996 WL 1143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court imposed a seven year sentence with a minimum mandatory sentence of three years to be served consecutively to a seven year sentence with no minimum mandatory portion. The state concedes that the sentence with the minimum mandatory provision should have been ordered to be served first in accordance with Palmer v. State, 571 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). See also Pioquinto v. State, 656 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions to resentenee the defendant so that the mandatory sentence is served first.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court imposed a seven year sentence with a minimum mandatory sentence of three years to be served consecutively to a seven year sentence with no minimum mandatory portion. The state concedes that the sentence with the minimum mandatory provision should have been ordered to be served first in accordance with Palmer v. State, 571 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). See also Pioquinto v. State, 656 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions to resentenee the defendant so that the mandatory sentence is served first.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 So. 2d 366, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 1996 WL 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniels-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack