Daniels v. State

235 So. 2d 740, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6444
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1970·No. No. M-136·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Daniels v. State, 217 So.2d 144 (Fla.App.1969); Pearsall v. State, 215 So.2d 58 (Fla.App.1968); Jolly v. Wainwright, 175 So.Zd 245 (Fla. App.1965), and Davis v. State, 44 Fla. 32, 32 So. 822 (1902).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 235 So. 2d 740, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6444 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

235 So. 2d 740 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Prosser
235 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)