Daniels v. State

216 So. 2d 762
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1968·No. No. 68-322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, files this appeal from an order of the court below denying his Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment and Sentence brought under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Appellant was informed against for the crime of robbery. He plead guilty to the information while being represented by privately retained counsel. From the record it is shown that appellant was well aware of the charge against him and the consequences of his plea of guilty.

We have carefully considered the arguments propounded by appellant and find them to be without merit. Finding no error on the record we therefore affirm the ruling of the trial court denying his Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Judgment and Sentence. See Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 834.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels v. State, 216 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

216 So. 2d 762 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
201 So. 2d 834 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)