Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniels v. State

217 So. 2d 144

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 1969·No. No. J-213·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Burton v. State, 128 So.2d 765 (Fla.App.2d 1961); and State v. Jones, 204 So.2d 515 (Fla.1967).

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Burton v. State, 128 So.2d 765 (Fla.App.2d 1961); and State v. Jones, 204 So.2d 515 (Fla.1967).

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Daniels v. State, 217 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

217 So. 2d 144 (Daniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related