Dania Lumber & Supply Co. v. Senter

152 So. 2, 113 Fla. 332, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1754
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 22, 1933·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

*333 Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment •of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., and Hutchison, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dania Lumber & Supply Co. v. Senter, 152 So. 2, 113 Fla. 332, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1754 (Fla. 1933).

152 So. 2 (Dania Lumber & Supply Co. v. Senter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. J. Jones Lumber Co. v. Morrison
154 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Bowser v. Harder
98 So. 2d 752 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Higbee v. Dorigo
66 So. 2d 684 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Stiles v. Wright
32 N.E.2d 220 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
G. Ferlita & Sons, Inc. v. Beck
197 So. 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Pendarvis v. Pfeifer
182 So. 307 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Jorge v. Umpierre
49 P.R. 75 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)
Neri Jorge v. Umpierre
49 P.R. Dec. 78 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)