D'Andrea v. Hutchins
This text of 69 A.D.3d 541 (D'Andrea v. Hutchins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[542]*542Plaintiff offered no new evidence in support of the part of his motion that sought renewal (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; C.R. v Pleasantville Cottage School, 302 AD2d 259 [2003]).
No appeal lies from the denial of a motion for reargument (Parker v Marglin, 56 AD3d 374, 374-375 [2008]).
Because he did not appeal from the order that granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiffs arguments addressed to that determination are not properly before us (Matter of Gonzalez v New York City Clerk, 25 AD3d 389 [2006]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.3d 541, 892 N.Y.2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dandrea-v-hutchins-nyappdiv-2010.