Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of New York, Inc.

136 A.D.3d 469, 24 N.Y.S.3d 506
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 2016·No. 162 110152/11·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2014, which denied plaintiff’s motion for renewal and reargument of defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs, as to renewal, and appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

*470 Plaintiff failed to support his motion for renewal with new facts “that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]).

Plaintiff’s arguments addressed to the order that granted defendant’s motion to dismiss are not properly before us since plaintiff failed to appeal from that order (D’Andrea v Hutchins, 69 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of New York, Inc., 136 A.D.3d 469, 24 N.Y.S.3d 506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 469 (Solomon v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E. B.-W. v. New York City Hous. Auth.
2020 NY Slip Op 3865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)