Matter of Thompson v. Board of Directors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Thompson v. Board of Directors

2017 NY Slip Op 8445, 155 A.D.3d 584, 64 N.Y.S.3d 513

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 2017

Docket5086 261117/14

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8445 (Matter of Thompson v. Board of Directors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Thompson v. Board of Directors, 2017 NY Slip Op 8445, 155 A.D.3d 584, 64 N.Y.S.3d 513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2015, which denied petitioner’s motion for, in effect, reargument of her ex parte application for an order to show cause seeking, in effect, reargument of respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, and denied her motion for reargument of respondents’ motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (D’Andrea v Hutchins, 69 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2010]).

We note that, since petitioner did not appeal from the order granting respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition, her arguments addressed to that determination are not properly before us (id.).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2015, which denied petitioner’s motion for, in effect, reargument of her ex parte application for an order to show cause seeking, in effect, reargument of respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, and denied her motion for reargument of respondents’ motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (D’Andrea v Hutchins, 69 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2010]).

We note that, since petitioner did not appeal from the order granting respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition, her arguments addressed to that determination are not properly before us (id.).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 8445, 155 A.D.3d 584, 64 N.Y.S.3d 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-thompson-v-board-of-directors-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack