Dalkeith v. State

263 So. 3d 243
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2019·No. No. 3D18-1333·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*244The defendant, Morris Dalkeith, appeals his conviction for trespass in a conveyance. We affirm, but remand for correction of the judgment to reflect that trespass in a conveyance is a second-degree misdemeanor, §§ 810.08(1) & (2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018), not a first-degree misdemeanor as listed in the judgment. As counsel for the parties candidly admit that the error was a scrivener's error, not judicial error, which when corrected will not affect the defendant's sentence, the judgment may be corrected without conducting a new sentencing hearing. Malone v. State, 225 So.3d 335, 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dalkeith v. State, 263 So. 3d 243 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

263 So. 3d 243 (Dalkeith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malone v. State
225 So. 3d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)