Dalkeith v. State
This text of Dalkeith v. State (Dalkeith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________
No. 3D18-1333 Lower Tribunal No. 18-2956 ________________
Morris Dalkeith, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Diane V. Ward, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE and HENDON, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge.
PER CURIAM. The defendant, Morris Dalkeith, appeals his conviction for trespass in a
conveyance. We affirm, but remand for correction of the judgment to reflect that
trespass in a conveyance is a second-degree misdemeanor, §§ 810.08(1) & (2)(a),
Fla. Stat. (2018), not a first-degree misdemeanor as listed in the judgment. As
counsel for the parties candidly admit that the error was a scrivener’s error, not
judicial error, which when corrected will not affect the defendant’s sentence, the
judgment may be corrected without conducting a new sentencing hearing. Malone
v. State, 225 So. 3d 335, 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dalkeith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dalkeith-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.