Malone v. State

225 So. 3d 335, 2017 WL 3161053, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2017·No. No. 3D16-1358·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Timothy Malone, appeals his convictions for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and petit theft. We affirm, but remand for correction of the judgment to reflect that the conviction for petit theft is a second-degree misdemeanor, not a second-degree felony. As counsel for the defendant candidly admits that the error was a scrivener’s error, not judicial error, which when corrected will not affect the defendant’s sentence (which was credit for time served), the judgment may be corrected without conducting a new sentencing hearing.

Affirmed, with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malone v. State, 225 So. 3d 335, 2017 WL 3161053, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

225 So. 3d 335 (Malone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C.Y. v. State
263 So. 3d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Dalkeith v. State
263 So. 3d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)