DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States

2004 CIT 110
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedAugust 26, 2004
Docket99-00178
StatusPublished

This text of 2004 CIT 110 (DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. United States, 2004 CIT 110 (cit 2004).

Opinion

Slip Op. 04-110

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

____________________________________ : DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Court No. 99-03-00178 : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant. : ____________________________________:

[Judgment for plaintiff following appeal.] Dated: August 26, 2004

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Lawrence M. Friedman and Harvey Karlovac), for plaintiff.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Jeanne E. Davidson, Deputy Director, Barbara S. Williams, Attorney-in-Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice (Saul Davis and Aimee Lee), Karen P. Binder, Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, of counsel, for defendant.

JUDGMENT

RESTANI, Chief Judge:

In accordance with the mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued on

August 2, 2004 and as requested by the parties, judgment following appeal shall now enter for

plaintiff as follows:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1. The United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection shall Court No. 99-03-00178 Page 2

reliquidate the entries of DaimlerChrysler Model Year 1993 and 1994

trucks at issue here to afford duty-free treatment under HTSUS subheading

9802.00.80 to the United States product sheet metal components

of the trucks sent to Mexico for assembly into the trucks as entered.

2. Interest and costs are awarded as provided by law.

/s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani Chief Judge Dated: New York, New York.

This 26 day of August, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 CIT 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daimlerchrysler-corp-v-united-states-cit-2004.