Home/Supreme Court of Rhode Island/D'Agostino v. Doorley

D'Agostino v. Doorley

367 A.2d 704, 117 R.I. 463, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1712
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJanuary 17, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 367 A.2d 704 (D'Agostino v. Doorley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D'Agostino v. Doorley, 367 A.2d 704, 117 R.I. 463, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1712 (R.I. 1977).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

John Quattrocchi, Jr., for plaintiffs. Louis A. Mascia, City Solicitor, V. Paul McGinn, Asst. City Solicitor, for defendants. Tillinghast, Collins & Graham, John J. Partridge, for Rhode Island Concrete Pipe Company and Edward C. Carmen, Jr. Inc.

Motion for reargument filed by plaintiffs is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D'AGOSTINO v. Doorley
375 A.2d 948 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 A.2d 704, 117 R.I. 463, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dagostino-v-doorley-ri-1977.