Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Opinion
We granted certification, 130 N.J. 601, 617 A. 2d 1223 (1992), to review so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as determined that the trial record contained sufficient evidence to permit the jury to apportion damages between asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking. See Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 259 N.J.Super. 17, 35-36, 611 A.2d 136 (1992).
We affirm the judgment on the foregoing issue, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge King's opinion for the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
622 A.2d 1305 (Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.