Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
This text of 622 A.2d 1305 (Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted certification, 130 N.J. 601, 617 A. 2d 1223 (1992), to review so much of the judgment of the Appellate Division as determined that the trial record contained sufficient evidence to permit the jury to apportion damages between asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking. See Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 259 N.J.Super. 17, 35-36, 611 A.2d 136 (1992).
We affirm the judgment on the foregoing issue, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge King's opinion for the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 A.2d 1305, 132 N.J. 96, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dafler-v-raymark-industries-inc-nj-1993.