Cutts v. Miller

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 20, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-10721·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn KX ALJULAH CUTTS, Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 10721 (LIL) -against- JUDGMENT CHRISTOPHER MILLER, Superintendent, Green Meadow Correctional Facility, Defendant. wn It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated January 25, 2021, the petition for a writ of habeas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addition, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). DATED: New York, New York September 20, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K rn ANgo Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cutts v. Miller, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Cutts v. Miller (Cutts v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)