Cuttler v. Cuttler
This text of 130 A.D.3d 674 (Cuttler v. Cuttler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Victor G. Grossman, J.), dated October 31, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant’s cross motion to enforce the determination in a prior order of the same court dated December 18, 2013, directing the plaintiff to execute the trust instrument proposed by the defendant.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s cross motion to direct the plaintiff to execute a trust instrument proposed by the defendant is denied.
In light of our determination in Cuttler v Cuttler (130 AD3d 672 [2015] [decided herewith]), the defendant was not entitled to enforcement of the directive that the plaintiff execute the trust instrument proposed by the defendant. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 A.D.3d 674, 11 N.Y.S.3d 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuttler-v-cuttler-nyappdiv-2015.