Cuttler v. Cuttler

130 A.D.3d 674, 11 N.Y.S.3d 872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cuttler v. Cuttler. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 A.D.3d 672
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 2015·No. 2014-10860·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Victor G. Grossman, J.), dated October 31, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant’s cross motion to enforce the determination in a prior order of the same court dated December 18, 2013, directing the plaintiff to execute the trust instrument proposed by the defendant.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s cross motion to direct the plaintiff to execute a trust instrument proposed by the defendant is denied.

In light of our determination in Cuttler v Cuttler (130 AD3d 672 [2015] [decided herewith]), the defendant was not entitled to enforcement of the directive that the plaintiff execute the trust instrument proposed by the defendant. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuttler v. Cuttler, 130 A.D.3d 674, 11 N.Y.S.3d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

130 A.D.3d 674 (Cuttler v. Cuttler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuttler v. Cuttler
130 A.D.3d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)