Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.
This text of 599 F.2d 1259 (Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petition for rehearing of 597 F.2d 35 filed by Appellee in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.
For the reasons pointed out by Judges Rosenn and Gibbons, Judges Adams and Higginbotham believe that the issues raised in this appeal are of sufficient importance so as to command the attention of the full Court. Accordingly, they vote for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 F.2d 1259, 27 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-wright-corp-v-general-electric-co-ca3-1979.