Curry v. Franklin Electric

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Curry v. Franklin Electric

783 S.W.2d 76, 30 Ark. App. 139, 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 73

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 7, 1990

DocketCA 89-440

StatusPublished

This text of 783 S.W.2d 76 (Curry v. Franklin Electric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curry v. Franklin Electric, 783 S.W.2d 76, 30 Ark. App. 139, 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 73 (Ark. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The Arkansas AFL-CIO has filed a motion for permission to file an amicus curiae brief in the above styled case. Rule 19 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals provides that a motion to file an amicus curiae brief should state the reasons why such a brief is thought to be necessary. Because the AFL-CIO motion filed in the instant case does not conform to the above stated requirement of Rule 19, the motion is denied.

Mayfield, J., concurs. Jennings, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Arkansas AFL-CIO has filed a motion for permission to file an amicus curiae brief in the above styled case. Rule 19 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals provides that a motion to file an amicus curiae brief should state the reasons why such a brief is thought to be necessary. Because the AFL-CIO motion filed in the instant case does not conform to the above stated requirement of Rule 19, the motion is denied.

Mayfield, J., concurs. Jennings, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 S.W.2d 76, 30 Ark. App. 139, 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curry-v-franklin-electric-arkctapp-1990.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack