Curry v. Franklin Electric
783 S.W.2d 76, 30 Ark. App. 139, 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 73
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curry v. Franklin Electric. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Ark. App. 168 →
Opinions
The Arkansas AFL-CIO has filed a motion for permission to file an amicus curiae brief in the above styled case. Rule 19 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals provides that a motion to file an amicus curiae brief should state the reasons why such a brief is thought to be necessary. Because the AFL-CIO motion filed in the instant case does not conform to the above stated requirement of Rule 19, the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curry v. Franklin Electric, 783 S.W.2d 76, 30 Ark. App. 139, 1990 Ark. App. LEXIS 73 (Ark. Ct. App. 1990).
783 S.W.2d 76 (Curry v. Franklin Electric) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferguson v. Brick
649 S.W.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1983)
Holiday Inn v. Coleman
778 S.W.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1989)