Curles v. Wade & Brimberry

106 S.E. 1, 151 Ga. 142, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 177
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1921
DocketNo. 2115
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 106 S.E. 1 (Curles v. Wade & Brimberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curles v. Wade & Brimberry, 106 S.E. 1, 151 Ga. 142, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 177 (Ga. 1921).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The words in the first item of the will vested in George Grover Jones an estate in fee simple, defeasible upon his dying without a child or children. Gibson v. Hardaway, 68 Ga. 370; Daniel v. Daniel, 102 Ga. 181 (28 S. E. 167); Chewning v. Shumate, 106 Ga. 751 (32 S. E. 544) ; Hill v. Terrell, 123 Ga. 49 (51 S. E. 81); Kinard v. Hale, 128 Ga. 485 (57 S. E. 761); Nottingham v. McKelvey, 149 Ga. 463 (100 S. E. 371); Slappey v. Vining, 150 Ga. 792 (105 S. E. 353); and see, for general discussion of similar cases, Hertz v. Abrahams, 110 Ga. 707 (36 S. E. 409, 50 L. R. A. 361); Anderson v. United Realty Co., 79 Ohio St. 23 (86 N. E. 644, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 477, 494, note).

2. The trust created for George Grover J ones became executed on his arriving at the age of twenty-one years, which, under the agreed statement of facts, he has attained. Hollis v. Lawton, 107 Ga. 102 (32 S. E. 846, 73 Am. St. R. 114); Phillips v. Lowther, 111 Ga. 852 (36 S.E. 596).

3. Intervenors had no vested interest in the property, and were not entitled to the relief sought by them.

4. Having held that George Grover Jones, under the will of his father, took a qualified or base fee in the land, it follows that the court did not err in refusing to interfere by injunction to restrain waste by him or by those proceeding under valid contract authority from him. Matthews v. Hudson, 81 Ga. 120 (7 S. E. 286, 12 Am. St. R. 305).

Judgment affirmsd.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raines v. Duskin
277 S.E.2d 26 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Reynolds v. Rackley
157 S.E.2d 283 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Johnson v. Johnson
99 S.E.2d 827 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Trimble v. Fairbanks
76 S.E.2d 16 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Scranton-Lackawanna Trust Co. v. Bruen
59 S.E.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Guess v. Morgan
26 S.E.2d 424 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Bank of Arlington v. Sasser
185 S.E. 826 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Todd v. Williford
150 S.E. 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
McCoy v. Olive
148 S.E. 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Hopkins v. Vance
125 S.E. 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Mathews v. Graddick
123 S.E. 299 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Roberts v. Wadley
118 S.E. 664 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Dean v. Wall
115 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Reynolds v. Dolvin
114 S.E. 879 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Moore v. Cook
113 S.E. 526 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Davidson v. Blackwell
108 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E. 1, 151 Ga. 142, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curles-v-wade-brimberry-ga-1921.