Nottingham v. McKelvey
This text of 100 S.E. 371 (Nottingham v. McKelvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A will declared: “I give and bequeath to my nephew, Willie H. Stubbs, the two-thirds interest in all the land that was deeded to me by my father on the 23rd day of June, 1873, to have and to hold the same in fee simple. . . I give and bequeath to my nephew, Alpheus B. Stubbs, the remaining one-third interest in the land deeded to me by my father on the 23rd day of June, 1873.” By a codicil, executed on the same day the will was executed, it was provided: “I will and desire that if my two nephews, Willie H. Stubbs and Alpheus B. Stubbs, should die without heirs of their body, then that all my property that is willed and given to them go and be the property of [other named persons], to them and their heirs forever, in fee simple.” Held:
1. The words in the above items of the will and codicil give the land to the above-named nephews of the testatrix in fee simple, defeasible upon their dying without child or children, although such nephews survived the testatrix. Civil Code, § 3662; Gibson v. Hardaway, 68 Ga. 370; Ewing v. Shropshire, 80 Ga. 374 (7 S. E. 554); Brown v. Lane, 147 Ga. 1 (92 S. E. 517).
(a) The cases of Patterson v. Patterson, 147 Ga. 44 (92 S. E. 882), and Heath v. Rhea, 149 Ga. 106 (99 S. E. 298), are distinguishable upon their facts.
2. The trial court erred in construing the will and rendering judgment in accordance with the erroneous construction given.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.E. 371, 149 Ga. 463, 1919 Ga. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nottingham-v-mckelvey-ga-1919.