Cunningham v. Hamilton County

Supreme Court

Cunningham v. Hamilton County

525 U.S. 1098

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 15, 1999

DocketNo. 98-727

StatusPublished

This text of 525 U.S. 1098 (Cunningham v. Hamilton County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. Hamilton County, 525 U.S. 1098 (1999).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, February 25, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 24, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 12, 1999. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, February 25, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 24, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 12, 1999. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 U.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-hamilton-county-scotus-1999.