Cunningham v. Dorsey

6 Cal. 19
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 19 (Cunningham v. Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Dorsey, 6 Cal. 19 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The third instruction given by the District Court, at the request of the plaintiff, is clearly erroneous. The true rule of damages is the value of the labor performed, and the amount of profit which could fairly have been derived from the labor left unperformed by the act of the defendants. Although afterwards, at the defendants’ request, the Court laid down the correct rule, yet it is impossible to say that the erroneous instruction first given had no influence upon the jury. Both stood together and were of equal force, and we cannot by computation ascertain by which one the jury was controlled.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cowan v. Tremble
296 P. 91 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Nadelman v. Pitchel
36 Misc. 768 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Howe Machine Co. v. Bryson
44 Iowa 159 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)
Dunn v. Johnson
33 Ind. 54 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1870)
Clark v. McElvy
11 Cal. 154 (California Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-dorsey-cal-1856.