Cummings v. Bird
115 Mass. 346, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 215
Opinion
The original plaintiff having deceased at the time of the argument of this cause, and the administratrix having now come in, it is first to be determined whether the suit, which is for a libel upon him, has abated by his death. The rule of the common law is that actions of tort for misfeasance or malfeasance do not survive, and if this action does so in this Commonwealth it is by virtue of Gen. Sts. c. 127, § 1.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. Bird, 115 Mass. 346, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 215 (Mass. 1874).
115 Mass. 346 (Cummings v. Bird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loeb v. Globe Newspaper Co.
489 F. Supp. 481 (D. Massachusetts, 1980)
Harrison v. Loyal Protective Life Insurance
396 N.E.2d 987 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1979)
Cohen v. Lion Products Company
177 F. Supp. 486 (D. Massachusetts, 1959)
McGrath v. C. T. Sherer Co.
291 Mass. 35 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Shedd v. Patterson
230 Ill. App. 553 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Putnam v. Savage
244 Mass. 83 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Frohlich v. Deacon
148 N.W. 180 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Young v. Aylesworth
86 A. 555 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1913)
Dixon v. Amerman
63 N.E. 1057 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary v. Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault Co.
68 S.W. 427 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1902)
Iron Gate Bank v. Brady
184 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Warren v. Para Rubber Shoe Co.
44 N.E. 112 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
151 U.S. 673 (Supreme Court, 1894)
United States v. De Goer
38 F. 80 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1889)
Conly v. Conly
121 Mass. 550 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)