Conly v. Conly
121 Mass. 550, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 42
This text of 121 Mass. 550 (Conly v. Conly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conly v. Conly, 121 Mass. 550, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 42 (Mass. 1877).
Opinion
It is useless to consider the merits of the plaintiff’s exceptions, because, if they should be sustained, the action could not be further prosecuted, having been abated by the defendant’s death since the exceptions were allowed. Gen. Sts. e. 127, § 1. Nettleton v. Dinehart, 5 Cush. 543. Cummings v. Bird, 115 Mass. 346. Action dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rosenblum v. Ginis
9 N.E.2d 525 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Shedd v. Patterson
230 Ill. App. 553 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Denslow v. Hutchinson
152 Ill. App. 502 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 Mass. 550, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conly-v-conly-mass-1877.