Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cruz v. State

675 So. 2d 615, 1996 WL 122865

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 1996

DocketNo. 96-00390

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 675 So. 2d 615 (Cruz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cruz v. State, 675 So. 2d 615, 1996 WL 122865 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Following review of appellant’s expedited motion for appeal bond and/or motion to review denial of appeal bond and the response thereto, the order denying the appellant supersedeas is vacated and remanded to the trial court to admit the appellant to bail pending review in accordance with Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308, 310 (Fla.1956) and make written findings in accordance with the criminal rule.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Following review of appellant’s expedited motion for appeal bond and/or motion to review denial of appeal bond and the response thereto, the order denying the appellant supersedeas is vacated and remanded to the trial court to admit the appellant to bail pending review in accordance with Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308, 310 (Fla.1956) and make written findings in accordance with the criminal rule.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 So. 2d 615, 1996 WL 122865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruz-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack