Tolbert v. State

792 So. 2d 637, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11871, 2001 WL 948314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 2001·No. No. 4D99-3239·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment of conviction on Count I, sexual activity with a child, and Count II, lewd assault. However, we reverse appellant’s sixteen-year aggregate sentence on both counts because, as the state concedes, it is an improper general sentence. See Parks v. State, 765 So.2d 35 (Fla.2000); Carter v. State, 689 So.2d 455 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Cruz v. State, 674 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Additionally, the sixteen-year sentence on Count II unlawfully exceeds the statutory maximum of fifteen years for that offense and is greater than the lowest permissible sentence on appellant’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet. '§§ 800.04, 775.082(3)(c), 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tolbert v. State, 792 So. 2d 637, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11871, 2001 WL 948314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 637 (Tolbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parks v. State
765 So. 2d 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Cruz v. State
674 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Carter v. State
689 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)