Cruz v. State

675 So. 2d 256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6655, 1996 WL 339106
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cruz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 660 So. 2d 792
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1996·No. No. 95-01733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Mr. Cruz’s convictions without prejudice to his raising the voluntariness of his plea in a properly filed motion for post-conviction relief. See Key v. State, 549 So.2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Counts v. State, 376 [257]*257So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We strike the five-year term of probation in count one of case number 94-3399, which follows the twelve-year prison term also imposed in that count. We affirm the five-year term of probation imposed for count two in case number 94-3399, and which follows the prison sentence in count one.

Affirmed as modified.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cruz v. State, 675 So. 2d 256, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6655, 1996 WL 339106 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

675 So. 2d 256 (Cruz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Counts v. State
376 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Key v. State
549 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)