Cruchon v. Brown

57 Mo. 38
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 57 Mo. 38 (Cruchon v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo. 38 (Mo. 1874).

Opinion

SiieRWOod, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

. This suit originated before a justice of the peace, and is based on an account for the sum of fourteen dollars and fifty [39]*39cents ($14.50) for certain articles of millinery, furnished by Mrs. Cruehon to the wife of defendant.

The plaintiff had judgment before the justice and the defendant appealed the cause to the Cape Girardeau Common Pleas, had a jury impaneled, went into trial and after the plaintiffs testimony was finished, moved the court to dismiss the cause because the action was not brought in the name of the real party in interest. This motion the court overruled ; defendant excepted, and the plaintiff again recovered judgment, to reverse which this cause is brought here by appeal; and we are asked to reverse the judgment, not because the indebtedness is denied, but on the ¡purely technical ground that the action is brought in the name of the husband to the use of the wife, when in strictness it should have been brought in the name of the husband alone.

The difficulty suggested by the defendant (who is evidently more particular than just) is easily obviated. Our Statute respecting amendments expressly authorizes the striking out of the name of a party in furtherance of justice or the correction of a mistake in any other respect after final judgment rendered, and also permits the court to which the cause is taken by writ of error or appeal, to make amendments of a like nature, which are not against “ the right and justice of the matter of the suit.”

The judgment of the court below will accordingly be amended by striking out the name of the wife and letting the judgment stand affirmed in the name of the husband alone. And upon the defendant will be cast the burden of all the costs which he has needlessly incurred in this petty litigation.

The other Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Main v. Main, Exec.
152 S.W.2d 696 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1941)
State Ex Rel. Missouri State Highway Board v. Cox
1 S.W.2d 787 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1927)
Talbot v. J. v. Brinkman Co. Bank
274 S.W. 501 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1925)
Citizens' State Bank of Ft. Gibson v. Strahan
1917 OK 225 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
O'Toole v. Lowenstein
160 S.W. 1016 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
State ex rel. Bell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
139 S.W. 163 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Hunter v. Kansas City Safe Deposit & Savings Bank
58 S.W. 1053 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Chouquette v. Southern Electric Railroad
53 S.W. 897 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Witte Iron Works v. Holmes
62 Mo. App. 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)
Sage v. Tucker
51 Mo. App. 336 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Bensieck v. Cook
19 S.W. 642 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
State ex rel. Ozark County v. Tate
109 Mo. 265 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Mellor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
105 Mo. 455 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Mechanics' Bank ex rel. Davis v. Gilpin
105 Mo. 17 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
McDermott v. Claas
104 Mo. 14 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
Orr v. Rode
101 Mo. 387 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
McClanahan v. West
100 Mo. 309 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1889)
Hemelreich v. Carlos
24 Mo. App. 264 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Purdy v. Gault
19 Mo. App. 191 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Matney v. Gregg Bros. Grain Co.
19 Mo. App. 107 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Mo. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cruchon-v-brown-mo-1874.