Crittindon v. LeBlanc
This text of 58 F.4th 844 (Crittindon v. LeBlanc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED ___________ January 31, 2023 No. 20-30304 Lyle W. Cayce ___________ Clerk
Jessie Crittindon; Leon Burse; Eddie Copelin; Phillip Dominick, III; Donald Guidry,
Plaintiffs—Appellees,
versus
James LeBlanc; Perry Stagg; Angela Griffin,
Defendants—Appellants. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:17-CV-512 USDC No. 3:17-CV-602 ______________________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before Higginbotham and Oldham, Circuit Judges.* Per Curiam: The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED because, at the request of one of its members, the court was polled, and a majority did not vote in favor of rehearing (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35). In the en banc poll, seven judges voted in favor of rehearing (Jones, Smith, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson), and nine voted No. 20-30304
against rehearing (Richman, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, and Douglas).
_________________________
* Judge Costa resigned on August 31, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 F.4th 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crittindon-v-leblanc-ca5-2023.