Criterion Interests, Inc. v. Deschutes Club
This text of 903 P.2d 421 (Criterion Interests, Inc. v. Deschutes Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant moves for reconsideration of our opinion. 136 Or App 239, 902 P2d 110 (1995). Among its arguments is that our statement that “[defendant does not assert that the deed is not an integrated writing,” id. at 245 n 4, is factually inaccurate. The statement does not precisely capture our intended meaning. We correct it to read: “Defendant makes no argument that the deed is not an integrated writing, except an implicit argument that depends for its success on the correctness of other arguments that defendant makes.”
We have considered and reject the other contentions in the motion.
Reconsideration granted; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
903 P.2d 421, 137 Or. App. 312, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/criterion-interests-inc-v-deschutes-club-orctapp-1995.