Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00606-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
CRISTINA CASTAÑEDA Appellant,
v.
DANNETTE ZUNIGA, Appellee.
On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Order Per Curiam This matter is before the Court on appellant’s brief. After due consideration of the
pleadings on file in this matter, the Court has determined that additional briefing is
necessary. Accordingly, the Court hereby requests supplemental briefing from appellant,
Cristina Castañeda, on all three issues presented in her brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.7
(“A brief may be amended or supplemented whenever justice requires, on whatever terms the court may prescribe.”); see also id. R. 38.1(i) (“The brief must contain a clear and
concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and
to the record.”). Appellant’s supplemental brief shall be filed within fifteen days from the
date of this order, and appellee’s supplemental brief, if any, shall be filed within fifteen
days thereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 6th day of August, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga (Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.