Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga
This text of Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga (Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00606-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
CRISTINA CASTANEDA, Appellant,
v.
DANNETTE ZUNIGA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
ORDER ABATING APPEAL
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant, Cristina Castaneda, appearing pro se, has filed a “Motion to Proceed in
Indigence” which contains an affidavit of indigence. Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal
and REMAND the cause to the trial court. We issue this order, accompanied by
appellant’s “Motion to Proceed in Indigence,” to the trial court and the court reporter, and
all parties. We order that pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(e), the trial
court clerk, the court reporter, or any party to this cause must challenge appellant’s claim
of indigence by filing a contest to appellant’s declaration of inability to pay costs in the
trial court within 10 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e).
If a contest is timely filed, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing or sign
an order extending the time to conduct a hearing within 10 days after any contest is filed.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i)(2)(B) (“The trial court must either conduct a hearing or sign
an order extending the time to conduct a hearing . . . within 10 days after the trial court
received a contest referred from the appellate court.”). However, the trial court may not
order the time for conducting a hearing on a contest to be extended for more than 20 days
from the date the order is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i)(3).
If a contest is timely filed, we ORDER the trial court, within 40 days from the date
of this order, to prepare a written order and written findings of fact and conclusions of law
regarding its indigence determination. We further ORDER the trial court clerk, as soon
as practicable but in no event later than 60 days from the date of this order, to file a
supplemental clerk’s record, containing (1) the contest; (2) the trial court’s order; and (3)
the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court reporter is ORDERED
to prepare and file the reporter’s record of the trial court’s hearing as soon as practicable
but in no event later than 60 days from the date of this order.
If no contest is filed or a contest is filed untimely, we ORDER the trial court clerk
to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certificate that states either no contest
was filed or a contest was filed untimely within 20 days from the date of this order.
2 PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 4th day of February, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cristina-castaneda-v-dannette-zuniga-texapp-2015.