Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
Docket13-14-00606-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga (Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00606-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

CRISTINA CASTANEDA, Appellant,

v.

DANNETTE ZUNIGA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant, Cristina Castaneda, appearing pro se, has filed a “Motion to Proceed in

Indigence” which contains an affidavit of indigence. Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal

and REMAND the cause to the trial court. We issue this order, accompanied by

appellant’s “Motion to Proceed in Indigence,” to the trial court and the court reporter, and

all parties. We order that pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(e), the trial

court clerk, the court reporter, or any party to this cause must challenge appellant’s claim

of indigence by filing a contest to appellant’s declaration of inability to pay costs in the

trial court within 10 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e).

If a contest is timely filed, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing or sign

an order extending the time to conduct a hearing within 10 days after any contest is filed.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i)(2)(B) (“The trial court must either conduct a hearing or sign

an order extending the time to conduct a hearing . . . within 10 days after the trial court

received a contest referred from the appellate court.”). However, the trial court may not

order the time for conducting a hearing on a contest to be extended for more than 20 days

from the date the order is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i)(3).

If a contest is timely filed, we ORDER the trial court, within 40 days from the date

of this order, to prepare a written order and written findings of fact and conclusions of law

regarding its indigence determination. We further ORDER the trial court clerk, as soon

as practicable but in no event later than 60 days from the date of this order, to file a

supplemental clerk’s record, containing (1) the contest; (2) the trial court’s order; and (3)

the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court reporter is ORDERED

to prepare and file the reporter’s record of the trial court’s hearing as soon as practicable

but in no event later than 60 days from the date of this order.

If no contest is filed or a contest is filed untimely, we ORDER the trial court clerk

to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certificate that states either no contest

was filed or a contest was filed untimely within 20 days from the date of this order.

2 PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 4th day of February, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cristina Castaneda v. Dannette Zuniga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cristina-castaneda-v-dannette-zuniga-texapp-2015.