C.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services
818 So. 2d 719, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2002·No. No. 2D02-1049·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
C.R. appeals the trial court’s order of dependency adjudication. The Department of Children and Family Services has previously responded and correctly concedes that necessary portions of the record are missing and cannot be reconstructed. The Department further concedes that the proper remedy is to vacate the trial court’s order and remand this case for further proceedings. Accordingly, the trial court’s order is vacated, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings.
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 818 So. 2d 719, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8798 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
818 So. 2d 719 (C.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D.L.C. v. State
889 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
M.N.D. v. State
888 So. 2d 151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
In Re Kr
818 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)