In Re Kr
This text of 818 So. 2d 719 (In Re Kr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Interest of K.R., and I.R., children,
C.R., Appellant,
v.
Department Of Children and Family Services, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nestor Castillo, Jr., of Nestor Castillo, Jr., P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tanya E. Difilippo, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
C.R. appeals the trial court's order of dependency adjudication. The Department of Children and Family Services has previously responded and correctly concedes that necessary portions of the record are missing and cannot be reconstructed. The Department further concedes that the proper remedy is to vacate the trial court's order and remand this case for further proceedings. Accordingly, the trial court's order is vacated, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings.
Vacated and remanded.
FULMER, GREEN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
818 So. 2d 719, 2002 WL 1368624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kr-fladistctapp-2002.