M.N.D. v. State
888 So. 2d 151, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18305, 2004 WL 2776982
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for reconstruction of the record. The State agrees that reconstruction of the Appellant’s adjudicatory hearing cannot be accomplished and concedes that the proper remedy is to vacate the trial court’s order and remand this case for a new hearing. We therefore, reverse and remand this case for a new adjudicatory hearing. See [152]*152In the Interest of K.R. and I.R., 818 So.2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.N.D. v. State, 888 So. 2d 151, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18305, 2004 WL 2776982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
888 So. 2d 151 (M.N.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
C.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services
818 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)