M.N.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

M.N.D. v. State

888 So. 2d 151, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18305, 2004 WL 2776982

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 2004

DocketNo. 5D04-778

StatusPublished

This text of 888 So. 2d 151 (M.N.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.N.D. v. State, 888 So. 2d 151, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18305, 2004 WL 2776982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for reconstruction of the record. The State agrees that reconstruction of the Appellant’s adjudicatory hearing cannot be accomplished and concedes that the proper remedy is to vacate the trial court’s order and remand this case for a new hearing. We therefore, reverse and remand this case for a new adjudicatory hearing. See [152]*152In the Interest of K.R. and I.R., 818 So.2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PLEUS, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI