Cox v. State

507 So. 2d 740, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1316, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8350
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1987·No. No. 86-1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

Appellant David Cox appeals his judgment and sentence for resisting a law enforcement officer with force. Appellant raises several issues in this appeal, but we find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines when imposing sentence upon him.

The trial court wrote as its sole reason for departure that appellant had been classified as a habitual offender. Habitual offender status is an invalid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986).

Accordingly, this case is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. State, 507 So. 2d 740, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1316, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8350 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

507 So. 2d 740 (Cox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silvestrini v. State
633 So. 2d 1143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)