Cox v. State
506 So. 2d 53, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1111, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1931 →
Opinion
Finding that the trial court’s failure to exclude defendant’s post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant’s insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. State, 506 So. 2d 53, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1111, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 53 (Cox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wainwright v. Greenfield
474 U.S. 284 (Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Burwick
442 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)