Cox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cox v. State

506 So. 2d 53, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1111, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7877

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 28, 1987

DocketNo. 85-2229

StatusPublished

This text of 506 So. 2d 53 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cox v. State, 506 So. 2d 53, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1111, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s failure to exclude defendant’s post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant’s insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court’s failure to exclude defendant’s post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant’s insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 So. 2d 53, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1111, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack