Home/Supreme Court/Cox v. Kansas

Cox v. Kansas

376 U.S. 191, 84 S. Ct. 637, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1789
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 17, 1964
Docket453, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 376 U.S. 191 (Cox v. Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Kansas, 376 U.S. 191, 84 S. Ct. 637, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1789 (1964).

Opinion

376 U.S. 191 (1964)

COX
v.
KANSAS.

No. 453, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 17, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, and Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U. S. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cox v. State
433 P.2d 470 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1967)
Donnell v. Swenson
258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Missouri, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 U.S. 191, 84 S. Ct. 637, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-kansas-scotus-1964.