Cox v. Kansas
376 U.S. 191, 84 S. Ct. 637, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1789
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 17, 1964·No. 453, Misc·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
COX
v.
KANSAS.
Supreme Court of United States.
Petitioner pro se.
William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, and Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U. S. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Kansas, 376 U.S. 191, 84 S. Ct. 637, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1789 (1964).
376 U.S. 191 (Cox v. Kansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. State
433 P.2d 470 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1967)
Donnell v. Swenson
258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Missouri, 1966)